Simplification of the AEIP9 #46
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Could be a good idea, but the type_mime would still be needed for aeweb / https / ipfs link.
As it the type_mime field could be completely removed |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I like this simplification.
I don't get why you'd need mime for aeweb/https/ipfs. Only the data require it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not against to keep it, if we want to keep the mime_type, we can:
WIth this latest option, the application wishing the be dataURI compliant to render the image, it would have to inject the mime-type before the ';' |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since the AEIP9 we introduced a structure to reference assets in token with base64, AEWeb, IPFS or HTTP links.
However this structure is a bit cumbersome and could be lifted a bit.
By using specific URI scheme we could reduce the footprint of the token def reducing fees reduce its cumbersomeness
What do you think of URI scheme like those:
The latter follow the Data URI scheme which well known in the web industry and could support different kind of format, hence removing the need of the type_mime field for this embedded resource.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions