Subscribing to a table doesn't load relationships to other tables #422
Unanswered
kenmueller
asked this question in
Feature Requests
Replies: 2 comments
-
Hey @kenmueller - you'll have to bear with us on this one as it's a surprisingly difficult problem to solve. We are working on it, but I don't have a timeline yet. I agree - it would be an amazing Dev experience when we get subscriptions like this |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@kenmueller I'm going to move this one to Discussions 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Feature request
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Subscribing to a table doesn't load relationships to other tables. This is unlike selecting elements from a table, where relationships are loaded normally.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like for relationships to be loaded when a table is subscribed to, just like selecting elements with
.select(...)
.Describe alternatives you've considered
I've considered subscribing to the entire relationship table, but that's unfeasible. I've also considered selecting the row in other table once I get the
INSERT
event, but that's also unfeasible.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions