You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
I get this failure in the Type-Tiny 1.010000 test suite:
Deep recursion on subroutine "Test::TypeTiny::should_fail" at t/20-unit/Types-Common-Numeric/ranges.t line 44.
But should_fail isn't a recursive function. It does do a goto \&Test::More::ok at the end after setting @_ so this could be a problem with cperl's tail call optimizations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oooh, additional information. should_fail is called all over the test suite, so I was curious why it was only this particular call that was dying.
Line 44 performs the 100th call of should_fail for ranges.t. The recursion limit is 100. So I guess it's thinking that these calls are recursive when they're really just repeated.
I get this failure in the Type-Tiny 1.010000 test suite:
But
should_fail
isn't a recursive function. It does do agoto \&Test::More::ok
at the end after setting@_
so this could be a problem with cperl's tail call optimizations?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: