Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parental consanguinity #330

Open
pnrobinson opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Parental consanguinity #330

pnrobinson opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@pnrobinson
Copy link
Collaborator

A question is if there is a best practice for representing knowledge about parental consanguinity in phenopackets. In principle this could be infered from the pedigree or later the GA4GH pedigree model. In practical use, sometimes it is enough to know that parental consanguinity of some form exists to focus on the analysis on recessive disorders and do runs of homozygosity analysis etc.

Currently, there is no HPO term for this, but it could be added somewhere near here: https://hpo.jax.org/app/browse/term/HP:0032443
However, where would be "put" this in a phenopacket?

Any thoughts @julesjacobsen @floherzler @buske

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant