-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Home page - clarification #5
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Could we make the problem statement and the mission more readable?
One solution is to use the Phuse proposal's problem statement and impact. Alternatively, we should reword it to make it more clear:
Background:
With the increased adoption of open-source statistical programming languages, there is a necessity to provide detailed metadata for each software used to ensure reproducible and consistent results.
Mission:
This project aims to develop a new templates, or enhance existing ones such as the Analysis Data Reviewer’s Guide (ADRG), to ensure that metadata pertaining to the versions of statistical packages and procedures is consistently documented in alignment with health authority expectations. These standardized templates will streamline the submission of clinical study metadata to health authorities as part of the regulatory review process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: