You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the current version when the voltage level is removed the other side of the voltage level has a corrupted status , this is even seen in a single line diagram.
The issue is that the removal of the voltage level does not consistently remove all the elements, their aliases and their references,specifically leading to the inconsistent connection of the elements on the other side of the voltage level
Lets take this example
220/110 has a trafo , the 220kV has further two lines, and also a trafo connecting 220/10 kv level.
When one tries to remove the 220kV voltage level the 110 kV voltage level and 10 kV voltage level has an inconsistent topology, this is probably because the removal is not proper, after the removal there are still some connections left.
Describe the expected behavior
When the voltage level id is removed the other side of the voltage level should just have dangling lines and the topology should be consistent.
Describe the steps
Load the network
Identify a voltage level and remove the voltage level
Export/write single line diagram for the connected voltage levels
The SLD is inconsistent
Export CGMES leads to an exception
Environment
0.22 version pypowsybl
Relevant Log Output
No response
Extra Information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the current behavior
220/110 has a trafo , the 220kV has further two lines, and also a trafo connecting 220/10 kv level.
When one tries to remove the 220kV voltage level the 110 kV voltage level and 10 kV voltage level has an inconsistent topology, this is probably because the removal is not proper, after the removal there are still some connections left.
Describe the expected behavior
Describe the steps
Environment
Relevant Log Output
No response
Extra Information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: