-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Area Interchange Control as OuterLoop #978
Comments
Agreed for outer loop + parameter. |
@jeandemanged can you please give a rough timeline on when this is expected to be implemented? thank you |
Hi @amir-saadat, I terms of timeline we expect:
|
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the current behavior
No support for Area Interchange Control
Describe the expected behavior
Ability to include Area Interchange Control (AIC) in OLF simulations.
The classical methods of doing AIC in a load flow are:
We propose as a first step to implement the OuterLoop approach only.
The feature can be enabled/disabled through OpenLoadFlowParameters.
Describe the motivation
Area Interchange Control is a classic feature of load flows - just like simulating ratio/phase tap changers. A quick google search reveals e.g. AIC is supported by:
Entso-e documents consider also AIC as a load flow option:
cim:PowerFlowSettings.interchangeControlEnabled": "true"
In the PowSyBl ecosystem this can be achieved today using powsybl-entsoe/balance-adjustment module, which is a quite complicated and slow implementation. Integrating the feature directly in OLF as an OuterLoop allows for faster performance, and enables also simulating AIC in security analysis - while powsybl-entsoe/balance-adjustment approach is not suitable when simulating thousands of contingencies.
Extra Information
Requires powsybl/powsybl-core#2883 to be implemented first in powsybl-core/iIDM
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: