Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Area Interchange Control as OuterLoop #978

Open
jeandemanged opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1055
Open

Area Interchange Control as OuterLoop #978

jeandemanged opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1055
Assignees

Comments

@jeandemanged
Copy link
Member

Describe the current behavior

No support for Area Interchange Control

Describe the expected behavior

Ability to include Area Interchange Control (AIC) in OLF simulations.
The classical methods of doing AIC in a load flow are:

  • Though an OuterLoop
  • Directly in the Newton-Raphson

We propose as a first step to implement the OuterLoop approach only.
The feature can be enabled/disabled through OpenLoadFlowParameters.

Describe the motivation

Area Interchange Control is a classic feature of load flows - just like simulating ratio/phase tap changers. A quick google search reveals e.g. AIC is supported by:

Entso-e documents consider also AIC as a load flow option:

In the PowSyBl ecosystem this can be achieved today using powsybl-entsoe/balance-adjustment module, which is a quite complicated and slow implementation. Integrating the feature directly in OLF as an OuterLoop allows for faster performance, and enables also simulating AIC in security analysis - while powsybl-entsoe/balance-adjustment approach is not suitable when simulating thousands of contingencies.

Extra Information

Requires powsybl/powsybl-core#2883 to be implemented first in powsybl-core/iIDM

@annetill
Copy link
Member

Agreed for outer loop + parameter.

@amir-saadat
Copy link

@jeandemanged can you please give a rough timeline on when this is expected to be implemented? thank you

@jeandemanged
Copy link
Member Author

@jeandemanged can you please give a rough timeline on when this is expected to be implemented? thank you

Hi @amir-saadat,

I terms of timeline we expect:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants