generated from privacycg/template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define 'expression of permission' when user response is undefined #26
Comments
hober
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2020
I think I've addressed this in #27. Please take a look. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In 3.1.1. User Agent storage access policies an 'expression of permission' is defined to represent the result of prompting the user. The current state of true == explicit allow and false == explicit deny makes sense. I don't think we necessarily would want to set the 'was-expressly-denied-storage-access-flag' if they didn't expressly deny access.
However there exists the case where the prompt may be dismissed without providing a response. I believe it's best to treat these as a deny and reject the promise rather than leaving it unresolved but without the permanent effect so a subsequent prompt "may" be made if the UA allowed it. Can we call out this scenario in the spec where the expression of permission isn't explicitly true/false but the question has been resolved in an undefined manner?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: