Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Temperature tutorial #11

Open
magnusbj opened this issue Sep 7, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Temperature tutorial #11

magnusbj opened this issue Sep 7, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@magnusbj
Copy link
Collaborator

magnusbj commented Sep 7, 2019

image
I wonder if you could give a guided tour of the temperature plot and show the effects working at different steps. My guess would be a higher temperature on the pipe flow than in annulus, as there is more friction generated within the pipe than within the annulus (unless very tight annulus?). Why does the temperature drop so heavily at the bottom, and why with such a curve as shown above? Maybe the pressure drop over the bit creates a large temperature drop, but that would be a straight line, not as a curve?

@magnusbj magnusbj added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested labels Sep 7, 2019
@jcamiloangarita
Copy link
Collaborator

The temperature is higher in the annular section because hot fluid from the bottom is flowing and also this section is more affected by the formation temperature. Besides, the temperature drops at the bottom mainly due to the fluid circulation (it depends on the flow rate), coming colder fluid from the drill string reaches warmer fluid in the annular.

To see this closer we can check the effect of the parameters using the function param_effect( ); for example, running the default data at circulation time of 40 hours, the result comes from: 64.97% fluid circulation, 21.68% heat source terms and 13.35% formation temperature.

@magnusbj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can we show just the pipe and annulus temperature along the well?

@magnusbj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can we see the contribution of friction (flow, rotation), fluid temperature and formation temperature contribution over time. So I want to start circulating, and see how the fluid temperature evolves along the wellpath, and see how the different functions are contributing to the temperature change.

@magnusbj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I still would like to understand the drop at the bottom of the string, entering annulus. Is this a calculation issue to make the model merge, or is it a physical property?

@magnusbj magnusbj added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Nov 25, 2019
@elyngvi
Copy link
Collaborator

elyngvi commented Nov 25, 2019

I am also confused by this.

"the temperature drops at the bottom mainly due to the fluid circulation (it depends on the flow rate), coming colder fluid from the drill string reaches warmer fluid in the annular."
I dont understand what you mean..

I would expect the temperature inside the pipe to increase all the way down to the bottom of the well, due to friction, and heat exchange with the annulus via the pipe wall (both positive contributions).
In the annulus, I would expect heat exchange with the formation (major positive contribution, unless the mud is somehow hotter than the formation), and with the pipe (negative contribution, tiny in the beginning, increasing towards the top of the well as the temperature difference increases), and some friction (positive).

So since thats not what we are seeing here, what is the physical property or effect at the bottom of the pipe, which causes the temperature to drop?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants