Implement autonaming configuration protocol

[mikhailshilkov]

Hello!

• Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
• If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

Implement the bridge part of pulumi/pulumi#1518. See pulumi/pulumi#17592 for the full design.

In short, pulumi/pulumi#17810 introduced the protobuf changes required for the provider-side implementation. With those, a provider can:

• Declare that it supports autonaming configurations with a response flag in Configure
• Accept two extra properties in CheckRequest: a proposed name and a mode to apply it

We need to implement autonaming configuration for all bridged providers. The bridge should pass the configuration from CheckRequest all the way down to the autonaming module. The module itself will be able to understand the modes and use the proposed name appropriately. Once a bridged provider upgrades its bridge version, autonaming configuration should highlight in it autonamically.

[pulumi-bot]

This issue has been addressed in PR #2675 and shipped in release v3.98.0.