Replies: 1 comment
-
According to the discussion today, the most likely reason for the negative objective is that the optimal value @GbotemiB thank you so much for sharing the results. feel free to check this explanation and propose a fix 😉 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, I am currently working on improving the Monte-Carlo feature in PyPSA-Earth.
Problem Objective
Making decisions is tough in Africa with fast-growing demand and big infrastructure changes. To deal with this uncertainty, I am using a Monte Carlo approach in the PyPSA-Earth model.
I am using Nigeria's Power System as a case study. I ran the simulation using the attached default config file with the Monte-Carlo option added, producing 961 networks. I observed that some of the solved networks had negative objective values.
My understanding of objective values translates to Annual cost which doesn't make sense to be negative.
Here is a plot of the objective values for all 961 solved networks
Here are the distribution plots for the parameters to which uncertainty is applied.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions