-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automated testing to compare with networkx #10
Labels
tests
Unit tests and/or continuous integration
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It would be super-duper handy to be able to automatically generate input graphs and node selection lists (i.e., masks) to run with both NetworkX and
graphblas-algorithms
and compare results.For example, it would be nice to cover:
Perhaps we could leverage
hypothesis
to help generate random inputs. I would be delighted if we began with a very small subset of the above.CC @jim22k who has done similar work in the past. Having this functionality would be incredibly useful in making sure we match NetworkX. For one thing, it would help us determine what to do about self-edges, which may be poorly defined at times for NetworkX (I really don't know if it is or not), but should be well-defined for us: do what NetworkX does.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: