-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trying To Specify a 3D Potential, Wierd Gaps #21
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
Your library is amazing and so are your examples. I was working on something similar for my research then stumbled upon your project.
I am trying to specify a simple barrier for Quantum Tunneling. I copy/pasted the method for rendering eigen modes and used it to render the potential
I specify the potential with this code
Here is what I get:
It took quite a lot of struggle getting too this point, and thankfully it is sort of working
I can just see a an evanescent probability density on the other side of where the barrier might be.
However its quite wonky, first there is the matter of the gap, the value should be constant wherever the conditions are satisfied.
If I double the offset (without changing
particle.x.max()
) the width of the barrier increases as well, while it should not be effected. Its like there are 2 of them.I did modify the existing way of rendering things, so maybe I did something wrong there and its just a graphical thing?
The field is normalized but if its constant over a region then it should have the same color/value throughout the region. I looked at the code for
Hamiltonian
, the generation of the potential looks pretty straightforward, I'm not sure what is causing it.So I would like to ask:
A: How do I resolve this, and is it me or qmsolve?
B: Could we have some documentation on how to specify potentials?
Thank you :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: