-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
DESCRIPTION
46 lines (46 loc) · 1.79 KB
/
DESCRIPTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Type: Package
Package: tipr
Title: Tipping Point Analyses
Version: 1.0.2.9000
Authors@R: c(
person("Lucy", "D'Agostino McGowan", , "lucydagostino@gmail.com", role = c("aut", "cre"),
comment = c(ORCID = "0000-0002-6983-2759")),
person("Malcolm", "Barrett", , "malcolmbarrett@gmail.com", role = "aut",
comment = c(ORCID = "0000-0003-0299-5825"))
)
Description: The strength of evidence provided by epidemiological and
observational studies is inherently limited by the potential for
unmeasured confounding. We focus on three key quantities: the
observed bound of the confidence interval closest to the null, the
relationship between an unmeasured confounder and the outcome, for
example a plausible residual effect size for an unmeasured continuous
or binary confounder, and the relationship between an unmeasured
confounder and the exposure, for example a realistic mean difference
or prevalence difference for this hypothetical confounder between
exposure groups. Building on the methods put forth by Cornfield et al.
(1959), Bross (1966), Schlesselman (1978), Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983),
Lin et al. (1998), Lash et al. (2009), Rosenbaum (1986), Cinelli &
Hazlett (2020), VanderWeele & Ding (2017), and Ding & VanderWeele
(2016), we can use these quantities to assess how an unmeasured
confounder may tip our result to insignificance.
License: MIT + file LICENSE
URL: https://r-causal.github.io/tipr/, https://github.com/r-causal/tipr
BugReports: https://github.com/r-causal/tipr/issues
Depends:
R (>= 2.10)
Imports:
cli (>= 3.4.1),
glue,
purrr,
rlang (>= 1.0.6),
sensemakr,
tibble
Suggests:
broom,
dplyr,
MASS,
testthat
Encoding: UTF-8
LazyData: true
Roxygen: list(markdown = TRUE)
RoxygenNote: 7.3.1