-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
natural_nat_shift #20
Comments
On 25 May 2018 at 13:03, Ramana Kumar ***@***.***> wrote:
In dwarf.lem there are some "missing pervasives" called
natural_nat_shift_left and natural_nat_shift_right with no definition but
with OCaml bindings. Are these equivalent to multiplication and division by
a power of 2?
Looking just at dwarf.lem, I think they're just that but with the mixed
natural / nat types - in HOL would just be multiplication and division by
2, y.
… If so, could they be defined that way, at least for the HOL backend?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#20>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AErM5vi0iCWk9hWoFERU2q3p9prd5YsWks5t1_MKgaJpZM4UN2-U>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In
dwarf.lem
there are some "missing pervasives" callednatural_nat_shift_left
andnatural_nat_shift_right
with no definition but with OCaml bindings. Are these equivalent to multiplication and division by a power of 2? If so, could they be defined that way, at least for the HOL backend?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: