Bug : Problem when manually adding a waypoint to a route built by WR.

[Gilletarom]

Dave,

From Gilletarom, W10, WR 1.15.10

I saw that you numbered the waypoints. Good.

In principle, with WR, we build “ready-to-use” roads. But sometimes the user adds one or more waypoints manually. This is what I achieved by adding a single waypoint.
After which, I reversed the route twice in a row, each time accepting that the waypoints were renumbered.

I observe that:
The new waypoint is added to the list of waypoints.

BUT :

• Renumbering doesn't quite work correctly. The new waypoint should have a name similar to the others.

• In addition, there should be two segments for which we do not know the travel speed.
  However, in the table of route properties, there is only one. See second screenshot.

In my test, there should be :

• a first segment from waypoint WX-Route-Point-1372-21 to waypoint O22
• a second segment from waypoint 022 to waypoint WX-Route-Point-1372-21.
  AND :
  Each of these two segments should be credited with the "Expected Speed" (6 knots in my case).

[Gilletarom]

We can even decide that the data calculated by WR for all the segments located after the two segments created by the introduction of a waypoint manually, must be forgotten.

The waypoint added manually is generally not added to the initial route and therefore, when navigating following the route, at the exit of these two segments, the time of passage to the first next waypoint is no longer respected, the weather taken into account is therefore likely to be different, and/or the currents, where there are any, change.

Therefore, all data previously calculated by WR must be verified and recalculated.

So, the entire end of the route must be recalculated.