Sailfish os 4.6.0.11 missing libprotobuf.so29

[smatkovi]

When installed from chum under sailfish OS 4.6.0.11 it complains about libprotobuf.so29, that it is missing.

[rinigus]

How did you install it for 4.6? As far as I can see, Chum 4.6 repos are not ready. So, as a result, the server cannot be used either

[smatkovi]

i set the version on chum to 4.5. i also tried to compile it on sfos 4.6.0.12 first on the phone, then with sfossdk updated through ssu re 4.6.0.11; zypper ref; zypper up; and i get the following errors on both: In file included from /usr/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_thread_sleep.hpp:22, from /usr/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/yield_k.hpp:23, from /usr/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock_gcc_atomic.hpp:14, from /usr/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock.hpp:42, from /usr/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock_pool.hpp:25, from /usr/include/boost/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.hpp:29, from /usr/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp:17, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/qi/string/symbols.hpp:30, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/qi/string.hpp:15, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/qi.hpp:28, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp:16, from include/mapnik/css_color_grammar.hpp:34, from include/mapnik/image_filter_grammar.hpp:28, from src/image_filter_grammar.cpp:23: /usr/include/boost/spirit/include/phoenix.hpp:12:1: note: ‘#pragma message: This header is deprecated. Use <boost/phoenix.hpp> instead.’ 12 | BOOST_HEADER_DEPRECATED("<boost/phoenix.hpp>") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/boost/phoenix/stl.hpp:14, from /usr/include/boost/phoenix/phoenix.hpp:19, from /usr/include/boost/phoenix.hpp:11, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/include/phoenix.hpp:14, from include/mapnik/image_filter_grammar_impl.hpp:29, from src/image_filter_grammar.cpp:24: /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:16:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’; did you mean ‘uarg1’? 16 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(1) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:19:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’ 19 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(2) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:22:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’ 22 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(3) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:25:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’ 25 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(4) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:28:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’ 28 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(5) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:31:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’ 31 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(6) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:34:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’ 34 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(7) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:37:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’ 37 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(8) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:40:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’ 40 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(9) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/boost/preprocessor/iteration/detail/limits/local_256.hpp:43:9: error: ‘arg1’ is not a member of ‘boost::phoenix::placeholders’; did you mean ‘uarg10’? 43 | BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(10) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ scons: *** [src/image_filter_grammar.os] Error 1 scons: building terminated because of errors. make: *** [Makefile:57: mapnik] Error 2

[smatkovi]

on 4.6.0.13, with chum also supporting 4.6.0.13 it still complains about this missing library

[rinigus]

Do you still have this issue? When using the version from Chum?

[smatkovi]

no, it's working correctly since you corrected this. i believe this was already in june.