This is a cross-post of the official security advisory. The official advisory contains a signed version with our PGP key, as well.
The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the std::fs::remove_dir_all
standard library function is vulnerable a race condition enabling symlink
following (CWE-363). An attacker could use this security issue to trick a
privileged program into deleting files and directories the attacker couldn't
otherwise access or delete.
This issue has been assigned CVE-2022-21658.
Overview
Let's suppose an attacker obtained unprivileged access to a system and needed
to delete a system directory called sensitive/
, but they didn't have the
permissions to do so. If std::fs::remove_dir_all
followed symbolic links,
they could find a privileged program that removes a directory they have access
to (called temp/
), create a symlink from temp/foo
to sensitive/
, and wait
for the privileged program to delete foo/
. The privileged program would
follow the symlink from temp/foo
to sensitive/
while recursively deleting,
resulting in sensitive/
being deleted.
To prevent such attacks, std::fs::remove_dir_all
already includes protection
to avoid recursively deleting symlinks, as described in its documentation:
This function does not follow symbolic links and it will simply remove
the symbolic link itself.
Unfortunately that check was implemented incorrectly in the standard library,
resulting in a TOCTOU (Time-of-check Time-of-use) race condition. Instead of
telling the system not to follow symlinks, the standard library first checked
whether the thing it was about to delete was a symlink, and otherwise it would
proceed to recursively delete the directory.
This exposed a race condition: an attacker could create a directory and replace
it with a symlink between the check and the actual deletion. While this attack
likely won't work the first time it's attempted, in our experimentation we were
able to reliably perform it within a couple of seconds.
Affected Versions
Rust 1.0.0 through Rust 1.58.0 is affected by this vulnerability. We're going
to release Rust 1.58.1 later today, which will include mitigations for this
vulnerability. Patches to the Rust standard library are also available for
custom-built Rust toolchains here.
Note that the following targets don't have usable APIs to properly mitigate the
attack, and are thus still vulnerable even with a patched toolchain:
- macOS before version 10.10 (Yosemite)
- REDOX
Mitigations
We recommend everyone to update to Rust 1.58.1 as soon as possible, especially
people developing programs expected to run in privileged contexts (including
system daemons and setuid binaries), as those have the highest risk of being
affected by this.
Note that adding checks in your codebase before calling remove_dir_all
will
not mitigate the vulnerability, as they would also be vulnerable to race
conditions like remove_dir_all
itself. The existing mitigation is working as
intended outside of race conditions.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank Hans Kratz for independently discovering and disclosing this
issue to us according to the Rust security policy, for developing the fix
for UNIX-like targets and for reviewing fixes for other platforms.
We also want to thank Florian Weimer for reviewing the UNIX-like fix and for
reporting the same issue back in 2018, even though the Security Response WG
didn't realize the severity of the issue at the time.
Finally we want to thank Pietro Albini for coordinating the security response
and writing this advisory, Chris Denton for writing the Windows fix, Alex
Crichton for writing the WASI fix, and Mara Bos for reviewing the patches.
The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the
std::fs::remove_dir_all
standard library function is vulnerable a race condition enabling symlink
following (CWE-363). An attacker could use this security issue to trick a
privileged program into deleting files and directories the attacker couldn't
otherwise access or delete.
This issue has been assigned CVE-2022-21658.
Overview
Let's suppose an attacker obtained unprivileged access to a system and needed
to delete a system directory called
sensitive/
, but they didn't have thepermissions to do so. If
std::fs::remove_dir_all
followed symbolic links,they could find a privileged program that removes a directory they have access
to (called
temp/
), create a symlink fromtemp/foo
tosensitive/
, and waitfor the privileged program to delete
foo/
. The privileged program wouldfollow the symlink from
temp/foo
tosensitive/
while recursively deleting,resulting in
sensitive/
being deleted.To prevent such attacks,
std::fs::remove_dir_all
already includes protectionto avoid recursively deleting symlinks, as described in its documentation:
Unfortunately that check was implemented incorrectly in the standard library,
resulting in a TOCTOU (Time-of-check Time-of-use) race condition. Instead of
telling the system not to follow symlinks, the standard library first checked
whether the thing it was about to delete was a symlink, and otherwise it would
proceed to recursively delete the directory.
This exposed a race condition: an attacker could create a directory and replace
it with a symlink between the check and the actual deletion. While this attack
likely won't work the first time it's attempted, in our experimentation we were
able to reliably perform it within a couple of seconds.
Affected Versions
Rust 1.0.0 through Rust 1.58.0 is affected by this vulnerability. We're going
to release Rust 1.58.1 later today, which will include mitigations for this
vulnerability. Patches to the Rust standard library are also available for
custom-built Rust toolchains here.
Note that the following targets don't have usable APIs to properly mitigate the
attack, and are thus still vulnerable even with a patched toolchain:
Mitigations
We recommend everyone to update to Rust 1.58.1 as soon as possible, especially
people developing programs expected to run in privileged contexts (including
system daemons and setuid binaries), as those have the highest risk of being
affected by this.
Note that adding checks in your codebase before calling
remove_dir_all
willnot mitigate the vulnerability, as they would also be vulnerable to race
conditions like
remove_dir_all
itself. The existing mitigation is working asintended outside of race conditions.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank Hans Kratz for independently discovering and disclosing this
issue to us according to the Rust security policy, for developing the fix
for UNIX-like targets and for reviewing fixes for other platforms.
We also want to thank Florian Weimer for reviewing the UNIX-like fix and for
reporting the same issue back in 2018, even though the Security Response WG
didn't realize the severity of the issue at the time.
Finally we want to thank Pietro Albini for coordinating the security response
and writing this advisory, Chris Denton for writing the Windows fix, Alex
Crichton for writing the WASI fix, and Mara Bos for reviewing the patches.