-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
update-notes-atlas.txt
186 lines (106 loc) · 4.88 KB
/
update-notes-atlas.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
=========
* ATLAS *
=========
**** H -> gamma gamma: HIGG-2016-21 ****
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2016-21/ (36 fb-1)
Data:
Fig 15: 2d likelihood contours of sigma x BR in ggH vs VBF plane
Fig 40a: observed correlation
Table 9: Best-fit values and uncertainties of the production-mode cross sections times branching ratio.
Figs 23a-d: Profile likelihoods of the signal strength measurements with -2 ln λ = Λ.
xml files:
HIGG-2016-21_ggH-VBF_gammagamma_f ... 2d Poisson distribution fitted from 1d profiles, correlation rho = ??
HIGG-2016-21_ttH_gammagamma_ps ... Poisson approx of 1d profile likelihood
HIGG-2016-21_VH_gammagamma_ps ... Poisson approx of 1d profile likelihood
Validation: (folder Final)
Fig 15: 1d mu's --> mu_VBF_ggH_2D_Poisson.pdf
Fig 18a: kappa_gamma vs kappa_gluon --> CgammaCg_from_ggH-VBF_gammagamma_f_Poisson-1dpara.pdf
Fig 18b: kappa_F vs kappa_V --> CVCF_from_ggH-VBF_gammagamma_f_Poisson-1dpara.pdf
### TODO ###
Correct comments in HIGG-2016-21_ggH-VBF_gammagamma_f.xml file (Done)
ATLAS-CONF-2018-028 (80 fb-1) has only cross sections, not the signal strengths
**** H -> ZZ* -> 4l ****
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2016-22/ (36 fb-1)
Data:
Fig 8a: 68% and 95% CL contours of sigma x BR in ggH vs VBF plane
Aux. Fig 4a and 4c: Correlation matrix ... 4c has rho = -0.41, was this used?
Aux. Fig 7a and 7b: 1d profile likelihoods for ggH and VBF production
Aux. table 3: signal strengths Stage-0 STXS
xml files:
HIGG-2016-22_VBF-ggH_ZZ_f ... 2d Poisson distribution fitted from 1d profiles, correlation rho = -0.41. ???
HIGG-2016-22_ttH_ZZ_pf ... comment says mu(ttH, ZZ) extracted from figure 7a, but this cannot be: Fig 7a is this one
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2016-22/fig_07a.png and auxiliary Fig 7a ia ggH, not ttH
HIGG-2016-22_VBF_ZZ_pf ... Poisson approx of 1d profile likelihood extracted from Aux. Fig. 7b
Validation: (folder Final)
Fig 8a: mu_ggH vs mu_VBF --> mu_VBF_ggH_2D_Poisson
Fig 8b: kappa_F vs kappa_V --> todo
### TODO ###
Correct comments in HIGG-2016-22_VBF-ggH_ZZ_f.xml file (Done)
Check HIGG-2016-22_ttH_ZZ_pf; what is this really? (Done, poisson full grids - fixed to .f)
Use just _f, not _pf (Done)
Validate Fig 8b: kappa_F vs kappa_V plot
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2018-018/ (80 fb-1)
*) H -> WW* -> 2l2nu
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2016-07/ (36 fb-1)
Data:
Fig. 9 gives 2d likelihood contours for sigma \times BR; pure signal strengths not given
rescale by SM prediction
xml files:
HIGG-2016-07_ggH-VBF_WW_n68
Validation:
Can only see how well 95% CL contour from Fig 9 fits when using 68% contour (todo)
*) H -> tau tau
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2018-021/ (36 fb-1)
superseded by
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2017-07/
Data:
Aux. Fig. 5 has 2d signal strengths: 68 and 96% CL contours in ggF vs VBF plane
xml files:
CONF-2018-021_ggH-VBF_tautau_n68 ... needs to be replaced by parameterization of HIGG-2017-07 Aux. Fig. 5
### TODO ###
update ATLAS-CONF-2018-021 --> HIGG-2017-07, use Aux. Fig. 5 (Done)
*) H -> bb
- VH, H->bb: https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2016-29/ (36 fb-1)
Data:
Fig 5: asymmetric \pm 1sigma intervals for WH and ZH production
xml files:
HIGG-2016-29_WH_tautau_ps ... Poisson parameterization according to Fig 5
HIGG-2016-29_zH_tautau_ps ... --"--
Valdation:
none (no material)
- VBF H -> bb : https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2016-30/ (36 fb-1)
Data:
Fig 6b: asymmetric \pm 1sigma intervals for VBF production
xml files:
HIGG-2016-30_VBF_tautau_s --> should be _ps
Valdation:
none (no material)
*) ttH
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2017-02/
Data:
Fig 16: best fit mu's \pm 1 sigma for ttH, H -> bbar, tau tau, VV, gam gam
Fig 17 a,b: 2d mu's showing final-state correlations
xml files
HIGG-2017-02_ttH_bb_s --> should be _ps; values are doubtful
HIGG-2017-02_ttH_gammagamma_ps
HIGG-2017-02_ttH_tautau_ps
where is HIGG-2017-02_ttH_VV_ps ?
Generally, I think we can use Gaussian approximation for this one.
Validation:
Figure 18: kappa_F vs kappa_V plot. ##todo##
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2017-03/
Data:
Fig 11: best fit mu's \pm 1 sigma for ttH, H -> bbar
xml files
HIGG-2017-03_ttH_bb_s
HIGG-2017-03_ttH_bb_ps
Must use EITHER ttH, H -> bbar from HIGG-2017-02 OR HIGG-2017-03, but not both
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2018-13/ (80 fb-1)
1sigma intervals for H->bb and H->gamma gamma in Fig 5
*) H -> invisible
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGG-2016-28/ (36 fb-1)
Data:
Aux. Figure 1c: 1-CLs for BR(H->inv)
xml files:
HIGG-2016-28_ZH_invisible_s with best fit = 0, 1\sigma = 0.41