Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/ui to ^2.9.0 #7919

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 29, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/ui (source) ^2.8.26 -> ^2.9.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/ui (@​sanity/ui)

v2.9.0

Compare Source

Features
  • support neutral and suggest tones (18c08b8)
  • theme: add new tones (fabe61c)
Bug Fixes
  • figma: support new color tones (31d8c48)
  • theme: adjust color tokens (d8b3181)
  • theme: generate tones based on constants (7252249)
  • theme: propagate hue based on tone setting (c11dc3d)
  • theme: use legacy types correctly (79510fe)
  • toast: use neutral tone for info status (cb56633)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 29, 2024 14:29
@renovate renovate bot requested review from cngonzalez and removed request for a team November 29, 2024 14:29
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 29, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 29, 2024 2:54pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 29, 2024 2:54pm
test-next-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 29, 2024 2:54pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 29, 2024 2:54pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 29, 2024 2:54pm

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Nov 29, 2024

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@sanity/ui@2.9.0 Transitive: environment +26 16.8 MB armandocerna, ash, atombender, ...61 more

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@sanity/ui@2.8.26

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Component Testing Report Updated Nov 29, 2024 2:49 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 38s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 53s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 3m 0s 0 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 52s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 45s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/RangeDecoration.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 40s 9 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 53s 12 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 29, 2024

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:50:48 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 22.7 efps (44ms) 22.0 efps (46ms) +2ms (+3.4%)
article (body) 56.7 efps (18ms) 53.6 efps (19ms) +1ms (+5.7%)
article (string inside object) 25.0 efps (40ms) 23.3 efps (43ms) +3ms (+7.5%)
article (string inside array) 22.7 efps (44ms) 20.8 efps (48ms) +4ms (+9.1%)
recipe (name) 42.6 efps (24ms) 45.5 efps (22ms) -2ms (-6.4%)
recipe (description) 48.8 efps (21ms) 52.6 efps (19ms) -2ms (-7.3%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (7ms) 99.9+ efps (7ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 17.5 efps (57ms) 18.2 efps (55ms) -2ms (-3.5%)
synthetic (string inside object) 17.2 efps (58ms) 17.5 efps (57ms) -1ms (-1.7%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 44ms 51ms 62ms 364ms 519ms 13.4s
article (body) 18ms 20ms 31ms 155ms 231ms 6.0s
article (string inside object) 40ms 42ms 51ms 206ms 181ms 7.1s
article (string inside array) 44ms 47ms 58ms 196ms 144ms 7.3s
recipe (name) 24ms 27ms 33ms 61ms 3ms 8.8s
recipe (description) 21ms 22ms 24ms 33ms 0ms 4.9s
recipe (instructions) 7ms 9ms 12ms 36ms 0ms 3.5s
synthetic (title) 57ms 61ms 69ms 272ms 863ms 14.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 58ms 62ms 66ms 180ms 720ms 9.2s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 46ms 50ms 80ms 217ms 282ms 13.1s
article (body) 19ms 20ms 37ms 247ms 264ms 6.0s
article (string inside object) 43ms 48ms 54ms 200ms 349ms 7.5s
article (string inside array) 48ms 53ms 58ms 238ms 268ms 7.7s
recipe (name) 22ms 25ms 30ms 51ms 0ms 7.9s
recipe (description) 19ms 22ms 27ms 88ms 0ms 5.1s
recipe (instructions) 7ms 9ms 10ms 14ms 0ms 3.4s
synthetic (title) 55ms 57ms 61ms 121ms 413ms 12.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 57ms 61ms 79ms 277ms 822ms 8.5s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@stipsan stipsan merged commit b28b160 into next Nov 29, 2024
55 of 56 checks passed
@stipsan stipsan deleted the renovate/sanity-ui-2.x branch November 29, 2024 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant