-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prātiśākhya ls references #41
Comments
InventoryThere are 9 lines in pwgbib_input pertaining to Prātiśākhya.
The total is 2785. In addition to these |
TS. PRĀT. and TAITT. PR.These two appear to be abbreviation variants of the listed abbreviation The simplest solution is to modify pwgbib_input for these two abbreviations, giving each of them
|
PRĀTIŚ. and PRĀT. abbreviationsThe link in #37 noticed an example in pwg.txt like This needs to be corrected to ṚV. PRĀTIŚ. 3, 18.`, and similarly for the others. Note that we currently have no tooltip for abbreviation
|
So many. The Rigveda one is in a corpus like format, I should play with it, if you could think of links, Jim. |
PRĀTIŚĀKHYAThese two instances seem to be also (as the 11th PRĀTIŚ case) not specific references. In pwg.txt,
In contrast to
|
PRĀT. abbreviation (part 1)The table above shows 215 of these
|
VP. PRĀT. ? (Help needed)There are four cases like the above, but with VP. as the preceding; e.g., These are questionable as VP. is abbreviation for VIṢṆUPURĀṆA; since VIṢṆUPURĀṆA is not part of Vedas, The four instances occur under headwords DrajImant, SUGana, sumatIvfD, surAma
|
case under urobfhatI
This is within the vol1-5 VN (corrections and additions) appearing at the end of vol. 5. Clearly, here SPELLING ERROR NOTICED:The above is a correction under headword urobfhatI.
This looks to be a print error in PWG, by
We should change L=12499 to 'urobfhatI'. |
Case under kAra (homonym 1)
My guess is that no change is needed here. PRĀT. is being used as abbreviation for PRĀTIŚĀKHYA, with no specific literary source reference. |
6 non-specific
|
There remain 43 unexamined cases of |
@funderburkjim, There exists a Prātiśākhya for Samaveda as well. Have a look at this- |
DrajImant: just look at the prev. entry (Draji) As you had correctly guessed, these all are not VP. PRĀT., but just VS. PRĀT. |
I take this as a response to my #37 (comment) You may act on the f2 and M2 cases (reported in this comment) as well. |
Thanks for researching these. Am changing to VS. and marking as print changes. |
Still it's not a usual word as well. |
In my working, all such are "treated" as "literary sources" (ls), whether occurring in abbr. form or in full form. And the person names (writers/compilers/translators/editors/...) are treated as "authors", and are part of the literary stuff. |
work finishedIn addition to changes noted above, considerable time was spent refining the 'ls' markup, so references to the various pratishakyas will be linkable if and when we develop a link target. The f6c648f link above shows the actual changes made to the pwg.txt digitization. A precursor to this diff, is the file changes.txt which was applied (via updateByLine.py) to the prior A couple of changes were made to the ls tooltip file for pwg; see commit. |
Help wantedAn attempt was made to get a list of cases that appear problematic; there are 27 of these in changes_todo.txt. Request others to examine these todo cases, with an eye to
|
What is refining the 'ls' markup?By this phrase is primarily intended dealing with multiple references; see the examples of inferred references in recent work with Rig Veda reference in pwg. Very similar ideas apply here with the various pratishakya literary source references. For all of these pratishakya references, the number of parameters was taken to be 2 (in contrast to 3 parameters for pwg).
And there are many similar and even more lengthy strings of references to be found in changes.txt. Why?Currently we have no linkable target for ṚV. PRĀT. , AV. PRĀT. , TS. PRĀT., and VS. PRĀT. However, when such linkable target(s) become available, this added markup will make the displays more robust in that tech noteThe Python program changes_remark.py can be adapted for similar markup enhancement for |
link targets (HELP WANTED)The only possible link target I found was one for RV. PRAT: https://archive.org/details/pratisakhyarigv00sarmgoog/page/n7/mode/2up. I don't know how to map pwg references to pages in this text. For instance, what page contains Does anyone have link targets for the other pratishakyas? |
@gasyoun maybe you could examine how the pwg RV PRAT links map to the pages of the archive org document mentioned above. If we could find the key to the mapping, @sanskritisampada could fill in the details. |
See these- [I had already given the link for Samaveda Pratisakhya earlier, in case it is needed any time.] |
@funderburkjim I'm a big fan of https://sites.google.com/view/rv-pratishakhya
@Andhrabharati what is your choice in each of the cases, what exact PDF? |
This issue aims to provide feedback re this comment in #37.
Here is what MW says about Prātiśākhya:
The general objective here is to generate improvements in
<ls>
markupThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: