-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FABM/SCHISM: UNFULFILLED DEPENDENCY: downwelling_photosynthetic_radiative_flux #134
Comments
The interior light field is not calculated by the host. You need to couple to a model that provides this light field, such as gotm/light.
We test this regularly with npzd, but not with ecosmo, so the dependency might be different. If it is, this needs to be implemented in the host. Unfortunately, the light field calculation changed a lot between FABM0 and FABM1 ... |
Thanks, got it. Can I use gotm just for light or do I need to use it for turbulence modelling too in this case? |
This is just the light model in the gotm "institute" folder, has nothing to do with GOTM turbulence, so you don't need GOTM. Can you please test and report success/failure with ecosmo, then close ticket if resolved? |
And of course, we could make a light field model internally available in the host. Someone would need to code it (for FABM1) .... |
That was exactly the point. Invoking light: in the fabm.yaml solved the issue. This worked keeping itur=3 in param.nml of SCHISM. |
Do you @jpein1 think it is necessary to implement a light routine in the host itself? |
Although compiling, by SCHISM-FABM-ECOSMO simulation crashes writing this statement at the and of mirror.out:
FABM/SCHISM: UNFULFILLED DEPENDENCY: downwelling_photosynthetic_radiative_flux
FABM/SCHISM: This is an interior field.
FABM/SCHISM: It has units W m-2
FABM/SCHISM: It is needed by the following model instances:
In fabm_schism.F90 it seems for API >= 1
call fs%model%link_horizontal_data(fabm_standard_variables%surface_downwelling_photosynthetic_radiative_flux,fs%par0)
intializes the SURFACE downwelling but not the interior light field. Is the latter missing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: