Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial Revision: Abstract Format #258

Closed
tylerjereddy opened this issue Sep 26, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Editorial Revision: Abstract Format #258

tylerjereddy opened this issue Sep 26, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor

tylerjereddy commented Sep 26, 2019

From Nature Methods Editorial Team:

Your abstract must be fewer than 80 words and should not include citations.

@mdhaber
Copy link
Contributor

mdhaber commented Sep 26, 2019

Simply cutting down to the most important 80 words:

SciPy is an open source scientific computing library for the Python programming language. SciPy 1.0 was released in late 2017, about 16 years after the original release. SciPy has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in Python, with over 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, 100000 dependent repositories, and millions of downloads per year. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities and development practices of SciPy and highlight some recent technical developments.

To avoid starting three of the four sentences with "SciPy":

SciPy is an open source scientific computing library for the Python programming language. Since its initial release in 2001, SciPy has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in Python, with over 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, over 100000 dependent repositories, and millions of downloads per year. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities and development practices of SciPy 1.0 and highlight some recent technical developments.

@stefanv
Copy link
Member

stefanv commented Sep 26, 2019

That reads well to me.

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I added this shortened version of the abstract to the revised Word document in #256, so closing, thanks Matt.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants