-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
selection_process.html
45 lines (45 loc) · 2.76 KB
/
selection_process.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
---
title: Anonymous Selection Process
keywords: selection process, anonymization process
---
<section class="pb-section">
<div class="container">
<div class="row justify-content-md-center text-center">
<div class="col-lg-7">
<h1 class="title font-weight-normal mb-3">Anonymous Selection Process</h1>
<p class="mb-5">In order to ensure that our choice of recipient is fair, unbiased, and anonymous, we've developed the following selection process. Please <a href="/index.html#section-contact">contact us</a> if you have any questions or concerns. Critical feedback is much appreciated!</p>
<div class="text-left">
<ol>
<li>
<p>Applications are submitted to a secure repository that reviewers do not have access to.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>All applications go through a strict anonymization process to eliminate any identifying information from the submitted material.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Reviewers are required to attend a reducing bias and application review training before viewing any applications.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Reviewers agree to maintain applicant’s confidentiality and each reviewer signs a confidentiality agreement.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest including connections to current SEBS students.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Reviewers read all submitted applications in order to ensure fair scoring and to familiarize themselves with the pool of applicants.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Reviewers score a subset of applications independently. Each application is reviewed and scored by a minimum of three individual reviewers.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Each applicant’s scores are added to create a single aggregate score. Aggregate scores are then ranked from highest to lowest.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Reviewers meet in a seminar to vote on the aggregated score ranking. If a two-thirds majority is not achieved, reviewers revisit each application and adjust ranking until a two-thirds majority is reached.</p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>