Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DistributionLambda for latent variable amortization/recognition networks/encoders #9

Open
st-- opened this issue Mar 30, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@st--
Copy link
Member

st-- commented Mar 30, 2021

We could make the LatentVariableLayer interface more explicit by changing encoders from the status-quo "return parameters for the approximate posterior distribution" to a DistributionLambda that returns the posterior-approximating distribution itself.
This would make the behavior more explicit, and remove the need to keep track of what class the prior was (instead simply relying on tfp's kl_divergence implementations).

@st-- st-- added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Mar 31, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant