You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was looking into the methodology of MC_Kernel, and comparing that to the equations given in Fichtner 2011. What I noticed is that kernel K_eta is slightly different defined in MC_Kernel than in Fichtner 2011:
MC_Kernel: 2*\rho ( v_{ph}^2 - v_{sh}^2 ) K_c
Fichtner: \rho ( v_{ph}^2 - 2*v_{sh}^2 ) K_c
Is this a bug or is there a reason this kernel is differently defined?
Cheers,
Janneke
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My feeling is that the definition of K_eta you have supplied above from Fichtner is its general definition.
K_eta as coded is the definition of K_eta for an isotropic reference medium.
Hi,
I was looking into the methodology of MC_Kernel, and comparing that to the equations given in Fichtner 2011. What I noticed is that kernel K_eta is slightly different defined in MC_Kernel than in Fichtner 2011:
MC_Kernel: 2*\rho ( v_{ph}^2 - v_{sh}^2 ) K_c
Fichtner: \rho ( v_{ph}^2 - 2*v_{sh}^2 ) K_c
Is this a bug or is there a reason this kernel is differently defined?
Cheers,
Janneke
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: