You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Bring CertikShield and other security focused products CertiK offers to Ethereum
Bring ETH and ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum to the CertiK chain, and vice versa
Architecture Overview
⚠️ [WIP] Proceed with caution ⚠️
Compatibility with BSC
Take some tokens on the BSC and send them to Ethereum
Send the tokens from Ethereum to the Cosmos chain
Readiness
Governance proposal later this year
Quick Bites
Peggy is now Gravity, and the pegzone concept has been left behind
Same security guarantee as the Cosmos Hub (billions of dollars of staked ATOMs)
ATOM and every other asset in Cosmos ecosystem can be traded on Uniswap and other DeFi products on Ethereum
IBC vs Bridges
IBC is designed to connect heterogeneous blockchains. For the IBC module to work, it has to be accompanied with customized bridge modules like Peggy
IBC could potentially work with probabilistic chains like Ethereum but it's not a feature on the current research roadmap
Peggy enables IBC chains to allow funds to be moved from Ethereum to any other cosmos chain connected to a chain running Peggy via IBC. Ethereum 1.0 itself isn't capable of supporting IBC
A bridge Operator has to maintain 3 processes:
Validator
Eth Full Node (or a light client peered with shared full nodes)
Eth Signer
They might possibly want to run the Relayers also, which submit batched txs and pay the gas
A validator for the Gravity bridge is identical to a validator for the cosmos chain that has the bridge deployed. If you are already a validator in a cosmos chain, having a Gravity bridge in that chain only adds workload to your existing ones
Deploy
$ git clone https://github.com/althea-net/peggy
$ cd solidity
$ npm install
$ npm run typechain
$ npx ts-node \
$ contract-deployer.ts \
$ --cosmos-node="http://localhost:26657" \
$ --eth-node="http://localhost:8545" \
$ --eth-privkey="<needs some eth to pay for the deploy>" \
$ --contract=artifacts/Peggy.json \
Summary
Architecture Overview
Compatibility with BSC
Readiness
Governance proposal later this year
Quick Bites
Peggy is now Gravity, and the pegzone concept has been left behind
Same security guarantee as the Cosmos Hub (billions of dollars of staked ATOMs)
ATOM and every other asset in Cosmos ecosystem can be traded on Uniswap and other DeFi products on Ethereum
IBC vs Bridges
A bridge Operator has to maintain 3 processes:
They might possibly want to run the Relayers also, which submit batched txs and pay the gas
A validator for the Gravity bridge is identical to a validator for the cosmos chain that has the bridge deployed. If you are already a validator in a cosmos chain, having a Gravity bridge in that chain only adds workload to your existing ones
Deploy
Learn More
althea-net/cosmos-gravity-bridge
Gas Estimates
TestNet #1 agenda
Aneka - Block Explorer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: