You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Freeswitch/Sofia discards subsequent 18x messages after receiving a provisional response (excluding 100, of course).
Unfortunately, this behavior causes issues, as many operators—particularly incumbents—send "Session Progress" messages followed by "Ringing."
The feature "sip_ignore_183nosdp" doesn't resolve the problem, as "Session Progress" messages often precede "180" both with and without SDP, as observed in numerous traces.
As a result, the A-party doesn’t receive any ringing notification at all.
It's important to highlight that there is no RFC prohibiting the transmission of 18x messages in descending order.
In fact, sending multiple 18x messages is both allowed and practical, as it enables pre-connect-announcements (e.g., tariff information) before ringing.
Moreover, this is simply a widespread reality.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
outgoing call to an external operator (e.g. incumbent) who sends back 183 and subsequent 180
Freeswitch does not forward the received 180 to the bridged A-leg
Expected behavior
be transparent for subsequent Provisional Responses
Package version
Version 1.10.10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In some countries, the correct detection of ringing (SIP 180, with audio detection as a fallback) is part of the regulatory rules for B2C outbound calls. These regulations specify the minimum number of seconds a customer’s phone must ring before the calling company can hang up, and the maximum number of seconds the phone is allowed to ring before the calling company must hang up.
In the end, a SIP 180 "Ringing" signal should only be generated by a device that is actively informing a user, and it should simply be passed down to the originating caller.
Describe the bug
Freeswitch/Sofia discards subsequent 18x messages after receiving a provisional response (excluding 100, of course).
Unfortunately, this behavior causes issues, as many operators—particularly incumbents—send "Session Progress" messages followed by "Ringing."
The feature "sip_ignore_183nosdp" doesn't resolve the problem, as "Session Progress" messages often precede "180" both with and without SDP, as observed in numerous traces.
As a result, the A-party doesn’t receive any ringing notification at all.
It's important to highlight that there is no RFC prohibiting the transmission of 18x messages in descending order.
In fact, sending multiple 18x messages is both allowed and practical, as it enables pre-connect-announcements (e.g., tariff information) before ringing.
Moreover, this is simply a widespread reality.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
be transparent for subsequent Provisional Responses
Package version
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: