You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently when and reconciles happen which triggers a workflow to run, i.e. new pipeline resource created the generated workflow runs within the kfp-operator-system namespace. To allow for segregation between providers it should be possible to run the workflows within a provider specific namespace, therefore allowing for separate management of the provider namespaces along with the service account setup therefore making it possible to apply correct security to data access etc between providers.
Describe the solution you'd like
On a KFP Operator user resource being created/updated/deleted and triggering a reconcile it should be possible to set the generated workflow to run within the provider namespace rather than al providers workflows running within the same namespace (kfp-operator-system by default)
Currently all workflows are generated in the configured namespace:
Namespace: workflows.Config.WorkflowNamespace
in the KfpControllerConfigSpec
This configuration value could be made optional and if not set then the namespace of the provider resource can be used.
KFP Operator service account will need the necessary access permissions to create the resource in the namespace.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently when and reconciles happen which triggers a workflow to run, i.e. new pipeline resource created the generated workflow runs within the kfp-operator-system namespace. To allow for segregation between providers it should be possible to run the workflows within a provider specific namespace, therefore allowing for separate management of the provider namespaces along with the service account setup therefore making it possible to apply correct security to data access etc between providers.
Describe the solution you'd like
On a KFP Operator user resource being created/updated/deleted and triggering a reconcile it should be possible to set the generated workflow to run within the provider namespace rather than al providers workflows running within the same namespace (kfp-operator-system by default)
Currently all workflows are generated in the configured namespace:
in the
KfpControllerConfigSpec
This configuration value could be made optional and if not set then the namespace of the provider resource can be used.
KFP Operator service account will need the necessary access permissions to create the resource in the namespace.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: