Be more explicit code review?

[TomHennen]

This requirement isn't very clear. Is this alluding to code review?

Originally posted by @marcelamelara in #1094 (comment)

[TomHennen]

FYI @zachariahcox

FWIW I think requiring code review at Level 3 wasn't the intent? We'd talked about having a separate tag that indicates if revisions are subject to code review.

[zachariahcox]

the text at the time was: "The change management tool MUST be able to authoritatively state that each new revision reachable from the protected branch represents only the changes reviewed via the process."

I think we can fix this by sticking with the "change management" phrase everywhere.
EG:

"changes reviewed" -> "changes managed"