You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. create robot model (for example stanford manipulator or baxter robot model
from
https://groups.google.com/a/rethinkrobotics.com/forum/#!mydiscussions/brr-users/
5X1-6w-Ja1I)
mdl_stanford
2. calculate inertia matrix without base transformation
stanf.base = eye(4);
M1 = stanf.inertia(qz)
3. calculate inertia matrix with abitrary different base transformation
stanf.base = trotz(pi/2)*transl([1;2;3]);
M2 = stanf.inertia(qz)
What is the expected output?
Expected: The inertia matrix should stay the same
What do you see instead?
Output: Inertia matrix changes with base transformation matrix
M1-M2
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Robotics Toolbox 9.9; Linux 64 bit; Should not matter here
Please provide any additional information below.
In rne_dh.m, Line 122
(https://code.google.com/p/matlab-toolboxes-robotics-vision/source/browse/matlab
/robot/trunk/@SerialLink/rne_dh.m?r=751#112), the base transformation is added
to the vector from the first joint frame to the second joint frame (pstar). By
doing this, the lever arm is not calculated for the first joint but for the
point [0;0;0]. By removing this line, the problem seems solved.
Please contact me, if this is not a bug and I missed something
Regards,
Moritz Schappler,
schappler@irt.uni-hannover.de
Research Assistant at the Institute for Automatic Control, Leibniz Universität
Hannover, Germany
Original issue reported on code.google.com by baxter....@gmail.com on 28 Jul 2014 at 1:56
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I inserted a link to the wrong revision. Here is the link to the current
revision
https://code.google.com/p/matlab-toolboxes-robotics-vision/source/browse/matlab/
robot/trunk/%40SerialLink/rne_dh.m#120
Original comment by baxter....@gmail.com on 29 Jul 2014 at 6:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
baxter....@gmail.com
on 28 Jul 2014 at 1:56The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: