-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider to use GraphQL types in the singular #119
Comments
Technically, since a collection represents a group of objects, it should probably be plural. If we follow GraphQL convention, since we return a list, the name should be plural. The schema however can be singular. How we best achieve that is subject to discussion. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
IMO, collection names are best expressed as singular for the (most usual) case in which every document represents 'one object'.
Plus it is inconsistently used currently, sometimes it is singular other times plural
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: