Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No-View Nested SDFGs #1696

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

No-View Nested SDFGs #1696

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tbennun
Copy link
Collaborator

@tbennun tbennun commented Oct 18, 2024

This PR implements the change proposed in #1695. See the discussion in that issue for more information as to the change.

This PR will likely not yet unify the descriptor repositories unless necessary.

Related to (and contains the fixes of) PR #1611.

Please do not merge this before a major version release.

@tbennun tbennun linked an issue Oct 29, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@phschaad phschaad added this to the 1.x milestone Oct 29, 2024
@phschaad phschaad added the 2.0 label Oct 29, 2024
tbennun added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
The PR adds a new syntax to support inline storage specification with
the `@` operator, supporting the following statements: `a = np.ones(M) @
dace.StorageType.CPU_ThreadLocal`.

This PR also fixes multiple minor issues in the Python frontend:
* `WarpTiling` did not respect sequential map schedules
* Non-sequence inputs for `numpy.fill` variants (e.g.,
`numpy.zeros(N)`)
* NumPy replacement syntax errors would sometimes not have source
information
* Fix type inference for nested scopes in Python frontend
* Dynamic thread block scheduling does not support multi-dimensional
maps
* Default schedule inference should use dynamic thread blocks if
they exist
* Type hints with storage type not being adhered to by the Python
frontend
* Validation issue #1562

The following changes were added as skipped tests and deferred to future PRs:
* Dynamic map range related issues: Fix deferred to #1696
* Dynamic thread block scheduling would not pass object to nested
functions: Fix deferred to future PR, see #1189 for more information
@tbennun tbennun linked an issue Nov 10, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Simplify returns an erroneous SDFG Deepcopying a nested SDFG does not copy constants
2 participants