suspend-related oopses #5
Comments
|
Sounds like somewhere there are unbalanced calls to disable_irq and enable_irq. Nothing serious, but somewhere there's likely a missing disable_irq or extra enable_irq call in power management code. |
TecnoDV
added a commit
to TecnoDV/android_kernel_motorola_msm8916
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2016
sultanqasim
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2016
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512815 commit e81107d4c6bd098878af9796b24edc8d4a9524fd upstream. My colleague ran into a program stall on a x86_64 server, where n_tty_read() was waiting for data even if there was data in the buffer in the pty. kernel stack for the stuck process looks like below. #0 [ffff88303d107b58] __schedule at ffffffff815c4b20 #1 [ffff88303d107bd0] schedule at ffffffff815c513e #2 [ffff88303d107bf0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff815c7818 #3 [ffff88303d107ca0] wait_woken at ffffffff81096bd2 #4 [ffff88303d107ce0] n_tty_read at ffffffff8136fa23 #5 [ffff88303d107dd0] tty_read at ffffffff81368013 #6 [ffff88303d107e20] __vfs_read at ffffffff811a3704 #7 [ffff88303d107ec0] vfs_read at ffffffff811a3a57 #8 [ffff88303d107f00] sys_read at ffffffff811a4306 #9 [ffff88303d107f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath at ffffffff815c86d7 There seems to be two problems causing this issue. First, in drivers/tty/n_tty.c, __receive_buf() stores the data and updates ldata->commit_head using smp_store_release() and then checks the wait queue using waitqueue_active(). However, since there is no memory barrier, __receive_buf() could return without calling wake_up_interactive_poll(), and at the same time, n_tty_read() could start to wait in wait_woken() as in the following chart. __receive_buf() n_tty_read() ------------------------------------------------------------------------ if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait)) /* Memory operations issued after the RELEASE may be completed before the RELEASE operation has completed */ add_wait_queue(&tty->read_wait, &wait); ... if (!input_available_p(tty, 0)) { smp_store_release(&ldata->commit_head, ldata->read_head); ... timeout = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout); ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The second problem is that n_tty_read() also lacks a memory barrier call and could also cause __receive_buf() to return without calling wake_up_interactive_poll(), and n_tty_read() to wait in wait_woken() as in the chart below. __receive_buf() n_tty_read() ------------------------------------------------------------------------ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags); /* from add_wait_queue() */ ... if (!input_available_p(tty, 0)) { /* Memory operations issued after the RELEASE may be completed before the RELEASE operation has completed */ smp_store_release(&ldata->commit_head, ldata->read_head); if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait)) __add_wait_queue(q, wait); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock,flags); /* from add_wait_queue() */ ... timeout = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout); ------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are also other places in drivers/tty/n_tty.c which have similar calls to waitqueue_active(), so instead of adding many memory barrier calls, this patch simply removes the call to waitqueue_active(), leaving just wake_up*() behind. This fixes both problems because, even though the memory access before or after the spinlocks in both wake_up*() and add_wait_queue() can sneak into the critical section, it cannot go past it and the critical section assures that they will be serialized (please see "INTER-CPU ACQUIRING BARRIER EFFECTS" in Documentation/memory-barriers.txt for a better explanation). Moreover, the resulting code is much simpler. Latency measurement using a ping-pong test over a pty doesn't show any visible performance drop. Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@ab.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> [jsalisbury: Backported to 3.13.y: - Use wake_up_interruptible(), not wake_up_interruptible_poll() - There are only two spurious uses of waitqueue_active() to remove] Signed-off-by: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
sultanqasim
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 19, 2016
commit c9eb13a9105e2e418f72e46a2b6da3f49e696902 upstream. If the orphaned inode list contains inode #5, ext4_iget() returns a bad inode (since the bootloader inode should never be referenced directly). Because of the bad inode, we end up processing the inode repeatedly and this hangs the machine. This can be reproduced via: mke2fs -t ext4 /tmp/foo.img 100 debugfs -w -R "ssv last_orphan 5" /tmp/foo.img mount -o loop /tmp/foo.img /mnt (But don't do this if you are using an unpatched kernel if you care about the system staying functional. :-) This bug was found by the port of American Fuzzy Lop into the kernel to find file system problems[1]. (Since it *only* happens if inode #5 shows up on the orphan list --- 3, 7, 8, etc. won't do it, it's not surprising that AFL needed two hours before it found it.) [1] http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/AFL%20filesystem%20fuzzing%2C%20Vault%202016_0.pdf Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
FacuM
referenced
this issue
in FacuM/android_kernel_motorola_msm8916
Jul 2, 2017
commit 3d46a44a0c01b15d385ccaae24b56f619613c256 upstream. PID: 614 TASK: ffff882a739da580 CPU: 3 COMMAND: "ocfs2dc" #0 [ffff882ecc3759b0] machine_kexec at ffffffff8103b35d #1 [ffff882ecc375a20] crash_kexec at ffffffff810b95b5 #2 [ffff882ecc375af0] oops_end at ffffffff815091d8 #3 [ffff882ecc375b20] die at ffffffff8101868b #4 [ffff882ecc375b50] do_trap at ffffffff81508bb0 #5 [ffff882ecc375ba0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff810165e5 #6 [ffff882ecc375c40] invalid_op at ffffffff815116fb [exception RIP: ocfs2_ci_checkpointed+208] RIP: ffffffffa0a7e940 RSP: ffff882ecc375cf0 RFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 000000000000654b RCX: ffff8812dc83f1f8 RDX: 00000000000017d9 RSI: ffff8812dc83f1f8 RDI: ffffffffa0b2c318 RBP: ffff882ecc375d20 R8: ffff882ef6ecfa60 R9: ffff88301f272200 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffffffffff R13: ffff8812dc83f4f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8812dc83f1f8 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffff882ecc375d28] ocfs2_check_meta_downconvert at ffffffffa0a7edbd [ocfs2] #8 [ffff882ecc375d38] ocfs2_unblock_lock at ffffffffa0a84af8 [ocfs2] #9 [ffff882ecc375dc8] ocfs2_process_blocked_lock at ffffffffa0a85285 [ocfs2] assert is tripped because the tran is not checkpointed and the lock level is PR. Some time ago, chmod command had been executed. As result, the following call chain left the inode cluster lock in PR state, latter on causing the assert. system_call_fastpath -> my_chmod -> sys_chmod -> sys_fchmodat -> notify_change -> ocfs2_setattr -> posix_acl_chmod -> ocfs2_iop_set_acl -> ocfs2_set_acl -> ocfs2_acl_set_mode Here is how. 1119 int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) 1120 { 1247 ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1); <<< WRONG thing to do. .. 1258 if (!status && attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) { 1259 status = posix_acl_chmod(inode, inode->i_mode); 519 posix_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode, umode_t mode) 520 { .. 539 ret = inode->i_op->set_acl(inode, acl, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS); 287 int ocfs2_iop_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, ... 288 { 289 return ocfs2_set_acl(NULL, inode, NULL, type, acl, NULL, NULL); 224 int ocfs2_set_acl(handle_t *handle, 225 struct inode *inode, ... 231 { .. 252 ret = ocfs2_acl_set_mode(inode, di_bh, 253 handle, mode); 168 static int ocfs2_acl_set_mode(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head ... 170 { 183 if (handle == NULL) { >>> BUG: inode lock not held in ex at this point <<< 184 handle = ocfs2_start_trans(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb), 185 OCFS2_INODE_UPDATE_CREDITS); ocfs2_setattr.#1247 we unlock and at #1259 call posix_acl_chmod. When we reach ocfs2_acl_set_mode.#181 and do trans, the inode cluster lock is not held in EX mode (it should be). How this could have happended? We are the lock master, were holding lock EX and have released it in ocfs2_setattr.#1247. Note that there are no holders of this lock at this point. Another node needs the lock in PR, and we downconvert from EX to PR. So the inode lock is PR when do the trans in ocfs2_acl_set_mode.#184. The trans stays in core (not flushed to disc). Now another node want the lock in EX, downconvert thread gets kicked (the one that tripped assert abovt), finds an unflushed trans but the lock is not EX (it is PR). If the lock was at EX, it would have flushed the trans ocfs2_ci_checkpointed -> ocfs2_start_checkpoint before downconverting (to NULL) for the request. ocfs2_setattr must not drop inode lock ex in this code path. If it does, takes it again before the trans, say in ocfs2_set_acl, another cluster node can get in between, execute another setattr, overwriting the one in progress on this node, resulting in a mode acl size combo that is a mix of the two. Orabug: 20189959 Signed-off-by: Tariq Saeed <tariq.x.saeed@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
sultanqasim
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2017
commit 420902c9d086848a7548c83e0a49021514bd71b7 upstream.
If we hold the superblock lock while calling reiserfs_quota_on_mount(), we can
deadlock our own worker - mount blocks kworker/3:2, sleeps forever more.
crash> ps|grep UN
715 2 3 ffff880220734d30 UN 0.0 0 0 [kworker/3:2]
9369 9341 2 ffff88021ffb7560 UN 1.3 493404 123184 Xorg
9665 9664 3 ffff880225b92ab0 UN 0.0 47368 812 udisks-daemon
10635 10403 3 ffff880222f22c70 UN 0.0 14904 936 mount
crash> bt ffff880220734d30
PID: 715 TASK: ffff880220734d30 CPU: 3 COMMAND: "kworker/3:2"
#0 [ffff8802244c3c20] schedule at ffffffff8144584b
#1 [ffff8802244c3cc8] __rt_mutex_slowlock at ffffffff814472b3
#2 [ffff8802244c3d28] rt_mutex_slowlock at ffffffff814473f5
#3 [ffff8802244c3dc8] reiserfs_write_lock at ffffffffa05f28fd [reiserfs]
#4 [ffff8802244c3de8] flush_async_commits at ffffffffa05ec91d [reiserfs]
#5 [ffff8802244c3e08] process_one_work at ffffffff81073726
#6 [ffff8802244c3e68] worker_thread at ffffffff81073eba
#7 [ffff8802244c3ec8] kthread at ffffffff810782e0
#8 [ffff8802244c3f48] kernel_thread_helper at ffffffff81450064
crash> rd ffff8802244c3cc8 10
ffff8802244c3cc8: ffffffff814472b3 ffff880222f23250 .rD.....P2."....
ffff8802244c3cd8: 0000000000000000 0000000000000286 ................
ffff8802244c3ce8: ffff8802244c3d30 ffff880220734d80 0=L$.....Ms ....
ffff8802244c3cf8: ffff880222e8f628 0000000000000000 (.."............
ffff8802244c3d08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 ................
crash> struct rt_mutex ffff880222e8f628
struct rt_mutex {
wait_lock = {
raw_lock = {
slock = 65537
}
},
wait_list = {
node_list = {
next = 0xffff8802244c3d48,
prev = 0xffff8802244c3d48
}
},
owner = 0xffff880222f22c71,
save_state = 0
}
crash> bt 0xffff880222f22c70
PID: 10635 TASK: ffff880222f22c70 CPU: 3 COMMAND: "mount"
#0 [ffff8802216a9868] schedule at ffffffff8144584b
#1 [ffff8802216a9910] schedule_timeout at ffffffff81446865
#2 [ffff8802216a99a0] wait_for_common at ffffffff81445f74
#3 [ffff8802216a9a30] flush_work at ffffffff810712d3
#4 [ffff8802216a9ab0] schedule_on_each_cpu at ffffffff81074463
#5 [ffff8802216a9ae0] invalidate_bdev at ffffffff81178aba
#6 [ffff8802216a9af0] vfs_load_quota_inode at ffffffff811a3632
#7 [ffff8802216a9b50] dquot_quota_on_mount at ffffffff811a375c
#8 [ffff8802216a9b80] finish_unfinished at ffffffffa05dd8b0 [reiserfs]
#9 [ffff8802216a9cc0] reiserfs_fill_super at ffffffffa05de825 [reiserfs]
RIP: 00007f7b9303997a RSP: 00007ffff443c7a8 RFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 00000000000000a5 RBX: ffffffff8144ef12 RCX: 00007f7b932e9ee0
RDX: 00007f7b93d9a400 RSI: 00007f7b93d9a3e0 RDI: 00007f7b93d9a3c0
RBP: 00007f7b93d9a2c0 R8: 00007f7b93d9a550 R9: 0000000000000001
R10: ffffffffc0ed040e R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 000000000000040e
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000c0ed040e R15: 00007ffff443ca20
ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
sultanqasim
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2017
commit 3d46a44a0c01b15d385ccaae24b56f619613c256 upstream. PID: 614 TASK: ffff882a739da580 CPU: 3 COMMAND: "ocfs2dc" #0 [ffff882ecc3759b0] machine_kexec at ffffffff8103b35d #1 [ffff882ecc375a20] crash_kexec at ffffffff810b95b5 #2 [ffff882ecc375af0] oops_end at ffffffff815091d8 #3 [ffff882ecc375b20] die at ffffffff8101868b #4 [ffff882ecc375b50] do_trap at ffffffff81508bb0 #5 [ffff882ecc375ba0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff810165e5 #6 [ffff882ecc375c40] invalid_op at ffffffff815116fb [exception RIP: ocfs2_ci_checkpointed+208] RIP: ffffffffa0a7e940 RSP: ffff882ecc375cf0 RFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 000000000000654b RCX: ffff8812dc83f1f8 RDX: 00000000000017d9 RSI: ffff8812dc83f1f8 RDI: ffffffffa0b2c318 RBP: ffff882ecc375d20 R8: ffff882ef6ecfa60 R9: ffff88301f272200 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffffffffff R13: ffff8812dc83f4f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8812dc83f1f8 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffff882ecc375d28] ocfs2_check_meta_downconvert at ffffffffa0a7edbd [ocfs2] #8 [ffff882ecc375d38] ocfs2_unblock_lock at ffffffffa0a84af8 [ocfs2] #9 [ffff882ecc375dc8] ocfs2_process_blocked_lock at ffffffffa0a85285 [ocfs2] assert is tripped because the tran is not checkpointed and the lock level is PR. Some time ago, chmod command had been executed. As result, the following call chain left the inode cluster lock in PR state, latter on causing the assert. system_call_fastpath -> my_chmod -> sys_chmod -> sys_fchmodat -> notify_change -> ocfs2_setattr -> posix_acl_chmod -> ocfs2_iop_set_acl -> ocfs2_set_acl -> ocfs2_acl_set_mode Here is how. 1119 int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) 1120 { 1247 ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1); <<< WRONG thing to do. .. 1258 if (!status && attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) { 1259 status = posix_acl_chmod(inode, inode->i_mode); 519 posix_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode, umode_t mode) 520 { .. 539 ret = inode->i_op->set_acl(inode, acl, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS); 287 int ocfs2_iop_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, ... 288 { 289 return ocfs2_set_acl(NULL, inode, NULL, type, acl, NULL, NULL); 224 int ocfs2_set_acl(handle_t *handle, 225 struct inode *inode, ... 231 { .. 252 ret = ocfs2_acl_set_mode(inode, di_bh, 253 handle, mode); 168 static int ocfs2_acl_set_mode(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head ... 170 { 183 if (handle == NULL) { >>> BUG: inode lock not held in ex at this point <<< 184 handle = ocfs2_start_trans(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb), 185 OCFS2_INODE_UPDATE_CREDITS); ocfs2_setattr.#1247 we unlock and at #1259 call posix_acl_chmod. When we reach ocfs2_acl_set_mode.#181 and do trans, the inode cluster lock is not held in EX mode (it should be). How this could have happended? We are the lock master, were holding lock EX and have released it in ocfs2_setattr.#1247. Note that there are no holders of this lock at this point. Another node needs the lock in PR, and we downconvert from EX to PR. So the inode lock is PR when do the trans in ocfs2_acl_set_mode.#184. The trans stays in core (not flushed to disc). Now another node want the lock in EX, downconvert thread gets kicked (the one that tripped assert abovt), finds an unflushed trans but the lock is not EX (it is PR). If the lock was at EX, it would have flushed the trans ocfs2_ci_checkpointed -> ocfs2_start_checkpoint before downconverting (to NULL) for the request. ocfs2_setattr must not drop inode lock ex in this code path. If it does, takes it again before the trans, say in ocfs2_set_acl, another cluster node can get in between, execute another setattr, overwriting the one in progress on this node, resulting in a mode acl size combo that is a mix of the two. Orabug: 20189959 Signed-off-by: Tariq Saeed <tariq.x.saeed@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
MSe1969
pushed a commit
to lin14-mGoms/android_kernel_motorola_msm8916
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2017
commit b2504a5dbef3305ef41988ad270b0e8ec289331c upstream. Dmitry reported warnings occurring in __skb_gso_segment() [1] All SKB_GSO_DODGY producers can allow user space to feed packets that trigger the current check. We could prevent them from doing so, rejecting packets, but this might add regressions to existing programs. It turns out our SKB_GSO_DODGY handlers properly set up checksum information that is needed anyway when packets needs to be segmented. By checking again skb_needs_check() after skb_mac_gso_segment(), we should remove these pesky warnings, at a very minor cost. With help from Willem de Bruijn [1] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6768 at net/core/dev.c:2439 skb_warn_bad_offload+0x2af/0x390 net/core/dev.c:2434 lo: caps=(0x000000a2803b7c69, 0x0000000000000000) len=138 data_len=0 gso_size=15883 gso_type=4 ip_summed=0 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 1 PID: 6768 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 4.9.0 sultanqasim#5 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 ffff8801c063ecd8 ffffffff82346bdf ffffffff00000001 1ffff100380c7d2e ffffed00380c7d26 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffff84b37e38 ffffffff823468f1 ffffffff84820740 ffffffff84f289c0 dffffc0000000000 ffff8801c063ee20 Call Trace: [<ffffffff82346bdf>] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [inline] [<ffffffff82346bdf>] dump_stack+0x2ee/0x3ef lib/dump_stack.c:51 [<ffffffff81827e34>] panic+0x1fb/0x412 kernel/panic.c:179 [<ffffffff8141f704>] __warn+0x1c4/0x1e0 kernel/panic.c:542 [<ffffffff8141f7e5>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xc5/0x100 kernel/panic.c:565 [<ffffffff8356cbaf>] skb_warn_bad_offload+0x2af/0x390 net/core/dev.c:2434 [<ffffffff83585cd2>] __skb_gso_segment+0x482/0x780 net/core/dev.c:2706 [<ffffffff83586f19>] skb_gso_segment include/linux/netdevice.h:3985 [inline] [<ffffffff83586f19>] validate_xmit_skb+0x5c9/0xc20 net/core/dev.c:2969 [<ffffffff835892bb>] __dev_queue_xmit+0xe6b/0x1e70 net/core/dev.c:3383 [<ffffffff8358a2d7>] dev_queue_xmit+0x17/0x20 net/core/dev.c:3424 [<ffffffff83ad161d>] packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:2930 [inline] [<ffffffff83ad161d>] packet_sendmsg+0x32ed/0x4d30 net/packet/af_packet.c:2955 [<ffffffff834f0aaa>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:621 [inline] [<ffffffff834f0aaa>] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 net/socket.c:631 [<ffffffff834f329a>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x8fa/0x9f0 net/socket.c:1954 [<ffffffff834f5e58>] __sys_sendmsg+0x138/0x300 net/socket.c:1988 [<ffffffff834f604d>] SYSC_sendmsg net/socket.c:1999 [inline] [<ffffffff834f604d>] SyS_sendmsg+0x2d/0x50 net/socket.c:1995 [<ffffffff84371941>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
MSe1969
pushed a commit
to lin14-mGoms/android_kernel_motorola_msm8916
that referenced
this issue
Sep 8, 2019
commit d982b33133284fa7efa0e52ae06b88f9be3ea764 upstream.
=================================================================
==20875==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 1160 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f1b6fc84138 in calloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xee138)
sultanqasim#1 0x55bd50005599 in zalloc util/util.h:23
sultanqasim#2 0x55bd500068f5 in perf_evsel__newtp_idx util/evsel.c:327
sultanqasim#3 0x55bd4ff810fc in perf_evsel__newtp /home/work/linux/tools/perf/util/evsel.h:216
sultanqasim#4 0x55bd4ff81608 in test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test tests/evsel-tp-sched.c:69
sultanqasim#5 0x55bd4ff528e6 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:358
sultanqasim#6 0x55bd4ff52baf in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:388
sultanqasim#7 0x55bd4ff543fe in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:583
sultanqasim#8 0x55bd4ff5572f in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:722
sultanqasim#9 0x55bd4ffc4087 in run_builtin /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:302
sultanqasim#10 0x55bd4ffc45c6 in handle_internal_command /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:354
sultanqasim#11 0x55bd4ffc49ca in run_argv /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:398
sultanqasim#12 0x55bd4ffc5138 in main /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:520
sultanqasim#13 0x7f1b6e34809a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a)
Indirect leak of 19 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f1b6fc83f30 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xedf30)
sultanqasim#1 0x7f1b6e3ac30f in vasprintf (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x8830f)
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Fixes: 6a6cd11 ("perf test: Add test for the sched tracepoint format fields")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190316080556.3075-17-changbin.du@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I started getting these on suspend/resume. Are they serious?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: