-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 722
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance benchmark and comparison #167
Comments
Oh, I see there is https://github.com/tboox/benchbox - maybe link it from this repo with some nice figures? |
Currently you can only do it by yourself, because I don’t have free time. |
only some old tests for coroutine, I haven't updated it in a long time |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I as a newcomer could not find any performance benchmark compared to other common libraries (musl, uclibc, glib, etc.) to answer the question "what will I sacrifice if I choose tboox".
Describe the solution you'd like
Some general performance benchmark of performance-sensitive aspects (malloc and related, sorting algos, hashing algos, tree algos, network/polling/... interface, etc.) compared 1:1 to at least glib or even better to other libs (e.g. musl).
Describe alternatives you've considered
Do it myself. That's too much time consuming and error prone (doing benchmarks in really hard).
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: