Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how about proposal-operator-overloading was withdrawn? #93

Open
softboy99 opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

how about proposal-operator-overloading was withdrawn? #93

softboy99 opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@softboy99
Copy link

https://github.com/tc39/proposal-operator-overloading was withdrawn, is there any influence with this proposal ?

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Jan 19, 2024

Yes, the same reason means that Decimal won't be able to be a primitive and thus have overloaded operators.

@munrocket
Copy link

Nice, after that polyfill will be easy to implement.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Mar 13, 2024

It certainly makes it polyfillable (without that, it's not polyfillable at all) - but it unfortunately also makes for a much less compelling utility argument for advancing the proposal at all.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants