Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AC List of terms does not explicitly give the type of its terms #269

Open
baskaufs opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

AC List of terms does not explicitly give the type of its terms #269

baskaufs opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@baskaufs
Copy link

In the original AC, there were no class terms defined (ServiceAccessPoint was implied, but not minted). So the list of terms did not list the class of the term, since all were rdf:Property. However, we have now minted ac:ServiceAccessPoint and ac:RegionOfInterest. So we should add that field in the build script so that the term's classes are explicitly given as rdf:Property or rdfs:Class.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant