You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Evaluate & confirm that having design types deployed in separate GitHub repositories is cost-benefit justified.
Should it be one design type to one repository ? Or perhaps should all spring types be in one repository and all demo design types in a separate repository ? External contributor design types can each have their own separate repositories.
Evaluate & confirm that having design types deployed in separate GitHub repositories is cost-benefit justified.
Should it be one design type to one repository ? Or perhaps should all spring types be in one repository and all demo design types in a separate repository ? External contributor design types can each have their own separate repositories.
From today's conversation:
designtypes/Piston-Cylinder/load.sql -> Repo=Piston-Cylinder server/load.sql
client/public/designtypes/Piston-Cylinder/favicon.ico -> Repo=Piston-Cylinder client/public/favicon.ico
client/src/designtypes/Piston-Cylinder/code -> Repo=Piston-Cylinder client/src/code
client/docs/Help/DesignTypes/Piston-Cylinder/file.md -> Repo=Piston-Cylinder client/docs/Help/file.md
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: