Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

topology2: add support for PDM DMIC with rt722 topology #9493

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

RDharageswari
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the support for 4 channel PDM DMIC with rt722 topology

Adding the support for 4 channel PDM DMIC with rt722 topology

Signed-off-by: Dharageswari R <dharageswari.r@intel.com>
@lgirdwood lgirdwood merged commit 20ca7a6 into thesofproject:main Sep 19, 2024
45 of 47 checks passed
@@ -7,4 +7,10 @@ list(APPEND TPLGS
SDW_AMP_FEEDBACK=false,SDW_SPK_STREAM=Playback-SmartAmp,SDW_DMIC_STREAM=Capture-SmartMic,\
SDW_JACK_OUT_STREAM=Playback-SimpleJack,SDW_JACK_IN_STREAM=Capture-SimpleJack"

"cavs-sdw\;sof-ptl-rt722-4ch\;PLATFORM=ptl,SDW_DMIC=1,NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS=1,NUM_DMICS=2,\
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well this is obviously wrong @bardliao @RDharageswari, please fix with NUM_DMICS=4

You'll miss me when I'm gone haha.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well this is obviously wrong @bardliao @RDharageswari, please fix with NUM_DMICS=4

Oops, thanks for pointing this out. @RDharageswari Can you submit a fixup patch?

You'll miss me when I'm gone haha.

Obviously yes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @plbossart #9500

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants