Using two or more independent sensor networks: Change the MAC_PREFIX or use separate reading ids? #174
-
Hi all, I would like to operate two or more independent sensor networks in the same vicinity.
Wireless "congestion" will not be an issue, the number of nodes will not exceed 10 nodes per network. What is the preferred route to go? Any suggestions? Thank you in advance! Christoph |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Great question! I think both should work equally, although I haven't tested option 2 as much. What it comes down to then, is which would be easier for you? If both sensor systems are nearly identical, it might make sense to keep two identical copies of the system files and just change the MAC prefix. If you are feeding all of your data into the same database and it would be better for your sensor IDs to be unique, that's a good case for the first option. At this point there's no preferred method, but I'd love to hear about what you choose and how it goes! As a note: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Great question! I think both should work equally, although I haven't tested option 2 as much. What it comes down to then, is which would be easier for you?
If both sensor systems are nearly identical, it might make sense to keep two identical copies of the system files and just change the MAC prefix. If you are feeding all of your data into the same database and it would be better for your sensor IDs to be unique, that's a good case for the first option.
At this point there's no preferred method, but I'd love to hear about what you choose and how it goes!
As a note:
With LoRa there is a syncword that should differentiate between networks, although that is also yet untested. I think if LoR…