-
|
Regarding TOSCA 2.0 support, the README on the puccini only says TOSCA 2.0 (in progress). Could you give more details about which parts of the TOSCA 2.0 spec (latest draft) are not yet supported? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
I have not been keeping progress in an organized way, but the spec is also not fully settled. The big things that have been implemented are the new function style, various keyword renaming, and support for tarball CSARs. Other aspects have still not been entirely finalized in OASIS. A csd of TOSCA 2.0 is going to be released at the end of the month, and that would be quite close to a final version. Puccini is going to follow 2.0 quite quickly. I imagine that by the time 2.0 is finalized, Puccini will be ready for 2.0. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the heads up, that's a start, looking forward to the next release of TOSCA 2.0 spec :-) . |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I have not been keeping progress in an organized way, but the spec is also not fully settled. The big things that have been implemented are the new function style, various keyword renaming, and support for tarball CSARs. Other aspects have still not been entirely finalized in OASIS.
A csd of TOSCA 2.0 is going to be released at the end of the month, and that would be quite close to a final version.
Puccini is going to follow 2.0 quite quickly. I imagine that by the time 2.0 is finalized, Puccini will be ready for 2.0.