You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why isn't the error caused by the input to the Mul layer not divided by the scaling factor, but multiplied by the same ?
If the input to the layer with the scaling factor of 2 is [1, 2] and the expected output is [4,4], the error would be [-2, 0]. Subtracting the scaled down error ([-1, 0]) from the input would correct the input.
Please clarify.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
singam-sanjay
changed the title
Why isn't the error scaled down during Mul:backprop ?
Why isn't the error scaled down during Mul's backprop ?
Oct 6, 2017
nn/Mul.lua
Lines 29 to 33 in 8726825
Why isn't the error caused by the input to the Mul layer not divided by the scaling factor, but multiplied by the same ?
If the input to the layer with the scaling factor of 2 is [1, 2] and the expected output is [4,4], the error would be [-2, 0]. Subtracting the scaled down error ([-1, 0]) from the input would correct the input.
Please clarify.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: