Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pgx v5 support #712

Open
elee1766 opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

pgx v5 support #712

elee1766 opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@elee1766
Copy link
Contributor

elee1766 commented May 7, 2024

any plans to upgrade or make another postgres wrapper which supports pgx v5?

pgxv5 performance is a good amount better, because it has a lot more reuse of connection read buffers. this is actually something we ran into with upper using both the SQL and pgxv4 driver. we ended up resolving the problem through just rewriting the resource hungry query routines in pgxv5 in a separate connection. currently we are avoiding the use of upper/db in our app unless necessary because of this.

I actually did this upgrade a while ago, ran into and fixed some problems with timezones, but otherwise the tests passed and it worked with my app. this is before v5 was released as stable.

would be happy to give another go at pgxv5 adapter for upper now that pgx v5 isn't in alpha and PR if this is something you guys would accept.

upper is still the best solution we've found for batching the upload of different structs via their tags.

@xiam xiam mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2024
@xiam
Copy link
Member

xiam commented Jun 23, 2024

Hello @elee1766,

How did you solve the timezones problem? I ran into the same thing. Can you try out this branch and see how it performs in your case? #715

Thanks,

@elee1766
Copy link
Contributor Author

elee1766 commented Jun 23, 2024

oh god this was a long time ago.

I'll look to see if I still have this code. IIRC it was that I had to set the time zone using pgx I believe?

also if you meant to link a branch, I think you just linked the issue. I assume you mean the referenced pr though - I'll try it.

@xiam
Copy link
Member

xiam commented Jun 23, 2024

@elee1766 Aah sorry, my bad; I meant this branch: #715. Thanks!

@elee1766
Copy link
Contributor Author

elee1766 commented Jun 24, 2024

synthetically it does better, but i don't have actual profiles from real application running in prod. (the distribution of calls is different)

i will see if i can maybe mirror some traffic, but no promises here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants