-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Semarang REM double ID #67
Comments
Seem the process is to:
|
confirmed: on the original geojson file, there is no double ID issue on single RW boundary. Q: do we use the "id" column or "@id" column for our REM? |
Apologies, I made an error when converting the original data. I have followed-up by email. |
@fadmastuti can you please check now that I have put Tom's latest data in the database and if correct? @talltom, provided this is correct, I can update the build scripts soon and then after that I will close. |
looking good now. thanks team! I think we can close this issue |
@fadmastuti thanks for quick feedback. I would like to add to the build script tomorrow US time (leaving @talltom to work on UI issues) and I will close then. |
I tried to test this and find out that we got double ID on each RW on the table below the map.
it will cause confusion in inputing the flood area update as it has 2 different ID. I will double check on the geojson data first if it is double or not.
cc @talltom @matthewberryman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: