You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For documentation: It would be good to describe more explicitly the range of storage types that are expected to work. Can I use polynomials and get rational functions? Can I use Gaussian integers and get Gaussian rationals? Ideally, T would not need to have comparison methods as long as I never reference Rational's comparison methods, but maybe they're needed internally for other purposes.
If the above are meant to be supported, it would be good to see a couple of test cases, too. Hopefully, the exotic storage types wouldn't have to be fully fleshed out if they're just for testing.
Also for test cases: Make sure you've handled the most negative value M of a signed binary integer type, since -M = M, which might cause trouble in lots of places.
Back to docs, it would be good to describe what it means to support GMP. What does one gain by using a Rational of GMP integers, rather than a native GMP rational?
On the implementation side, I don't think you need to declare your own [copy, move] [constructor, assignment operator]s or destructor. It looks like your implementations aren't doing anything special.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From Reddit:
Very cool!
For documentation: It would be good to describe more explicitly the range of storage types that are expected to work. Can I use polynomials and get rational functions? Can I use Gaussian integers and get Gaussian rationals? Ideally, T would not need to have comparison methods as long as I never reference Rational's comparison methods, but maybe they're needed internally for other purposes.
If the above are meant to be supported, it would be good to see a couple of test cases, too. Hopefully, the exotic storage types wouldn't have to be fully fleshed out if they're just for testing.
Also for test cases: Make sure you've handled the most negative value M of a signed binary integer type, since -M = M, which might cause trouble in lots of places.
Back to docs, it would be good to describe what it means to support GMP. What does one gain by using a Rational of GMP integers, rather than a native GMP rational?
On the implementation side, I don't think you need to declare your own [copy, move] [constructor, assignment operator]s or destructor. It looks like your implementations aren't doing anything special.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: