Next.js needs to stabilize #56696
Replies: 3 comments
-
Don't they keep it in trial period until it is stable? I don't usually "try" anything during its experimental period because I don't really have much time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I upgraded to release 14 which caused undocumented breaking changes! In my case headers that I relied upon are no longer part of the request. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
TBH I feel the same. Loving Next features and studying if it could be the stack I need for a new app. There was a solution for every technical thing I needed and I could set it up (multi-tenant redirections, image optimization, dynamic site-map/robots), loved the app router and the way we configure components in it. But
Maybe it's the way you shall move, delivering fast and incrementally, but i can't stop feeling it's at the expense of users. Anyway, i'm afraid of choosing Next for my new app, it will be big, have a lot of domain logic, pages. If I go this way and
Having said that, I like the choices you made, especially in App Router and RSC, and don't see other frameworks that seem to me scalable enough for big apps (e.g., Remix might not have caching issues but the fetch-by-page is a no go for me in a typescript manner and components standalone-ity manner, for a big app) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Next.js is a great platform with an amazing community support. Unfortunately it happens too often that things break in new releases. Currently there are 2.4k unresolved issues reported.
In my case I cannot upgrade from 13.4.12 to 13.5.4 as the build breaks.
I think it would make sense to slow down on development and stabilize the platform. In my opinion the unresolved issues are a risk for the popularity of the platform in the future.
28 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions