You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I run the code 2 times(one using linear kernel, another using gaussain kernel) in OTB50, every setting is same except the kernel. The results are ,the tracking speed of using linear kernel is 236fps, and the tracking speed of using gaussain kernel is 234fps.
In theory, the speed of using linear kernel is faster than using gaussain kernel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hjl240
changed the title
why the tracking speed of using linear kernel and using gaussain kernel is similar?
why the tracking speed of using linear kernel and using gaussain kernel are similar?
Aug 30, 2018
Hi,
I also think that the linear kernel should be faster then gaussian. However, the computation of these kernels is probably negligible to the other parts (FFT, ...) so the fps is basically the same.
If you are really interested in answer, you can do some code profiling to measure how much time is actually spend in the kernel computation w.r.t. the rest of the code, which should give you the answer.
I run the code 2 times(one using linear kernel, another using gaussain kernel) in OTB50, every setting is same except the kernel. The results are ,the tracking speed of using linear kernel is 236fps, and the tracking speed of using gaussain kernel is 234fps.
In theory, the speed of using linear kernel is faster than using gaussain kernel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: