New Section: Relationship to VC-API

[mkhraisha]

The spec should have a section that outlines the relation ship of the Trace Interop to the VC-API

[mkhraisha]

Separate Definitions of profile:

Profile = Strict subset of the thing we are based on.
Profile = Strict subset of the thing we are based on with added information.

You do not need to read the VC-API spec to understand our spec.
We will informatively reference it but not normatively.

[nissimsan]

Yes. Please update the wording on this.

[nissimsan]

Ping @mkhraisha , updates on this?

[rhofvendahl]

@mkhraisha Pinging

[mkhraisha]

per patrick's comment we should point out the options field discrepancy between vc api and trace api.

[PatStLouis]

Can we close #589 and refer to it in this issue? We have confirmed there was no misalignment now we just need a mention of this in a PR. @mkhraisha You can assign this to me.

[mkhraisha]

This should basically say go to VC API to figure out communication within trust boundary.

The should say the only thing we care about is interoperable communication across trust boundaries in a supply chain setting.

[mkhraisha]

@PatStLouis to work on it soon.

[nissimsan]

@PatStLouis confirmed still on this.

[mkhraisha]

@PatStLouis any updates?

[nissimsan]

Issue pending PR resolve.