You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Scoped Contexts, the description of Type-Scoped Contexts has two notes (right after this note):
When expanding, each value of @type is considered (in code point order) where that value is also a term in the active context having its own type-scoped context. If so, that the scoped context is applied to the active context.
The values of @type are unordered, so if multiple types are listed, the order that type-scoped contexts are applied is based on code point ordering
I suggest to merge these two notes and make it more explicit that later contexts override earlier contexts;
and add a last sentence to say explicitly that @type must be present in the JSON-LD instance for type-scoped contexts to work:
When expanding, each value of @type is considered. If the value is also a term in the active context having its own type-scoped context, the scoped context is applied to the active context. If multiple @type types are present they are applied in code point order (since the values of @type are unordered), and terms defined in later scoped contexts take precedence. If no @type is present then no type-scoped contexts are applied.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In Scoped Contexts, the description of Type-Scoped Contexts has two notes (right after this note):
I suggest to merge these two notes and make it more explicit that later contexts override earlier contexts;
and add a last sentence to say explicitly that
@type
must be present in the JSON-LD instance for type-scoped contexts to work:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: