-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
odrl:payAmount (possible for 3.0?) #59
Comments
Can you use |
I am doing that at the moment ('the price for this action for this asset is ... over there') ... i am not sure that the payAmount wording is aligned with how the lifecycle of assets and prices are "updated" in separate planes. People will either move to build this in a new profile (extra cost of interoperability) or miss the value of duties (too disconnected from the real world). If
|
Yes...add more examples !!! |
Added @joshcornejo to add the example to the best practices document. |
reminder for @joshcornejo to create a pull request in the best practices document. Please note that if "fibo" vocabulary elements are present, they are preferred. |
In practice, prices will vary independently from policies, generating policies on the fly with allocated prices is not always going to be practical (most likely a small percentage of use cases). One option is to decouple the value of the payment from normative MUST be xsd:decimal and introducing a URI reference to a pricing list that can change independently. A second option is to introduce a new operand (
odrl:paymentReference
/odrl:pricingReference
) that can separately evaluate at runtime the cost based on < asset, action, pricing list >.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: